Common blunders in Forex risk Management
By Dr. Akansha Jain
The issue is how to best manage foreign
exchange and be in win win situation. This is common problem faced by
multinationals for years. Rapidly changing business models make life especially
difficult for those who are tasked with managing a company’s foreign exchange
risk, and many pitfalls await those who are ill-prepared. Developing proper
position often suffers from common and costly problems like
1. Sticking
to same practices
MNCs have generally rigidity
about their current practices and have fear of change. Because the stakes can
be so high, the perceived “safety” of maintaining any current approach can
cause disaster. The problem with maintaining status quo is that the environment
is not constant and assumptions that may have been true many years ago are no longer
true today. FX policies needs to be implemented or updated over time in
response to huge FX losses generated by exposures that weren’t previously
considered or well understood.
2.
Following
the direction of currency movements
A successful hedging program shouldn't be influenced at all by
directional views, or by the most recent trends that have occurred. The success
of a hedging program needs to take both the underlying exposure and the hedge
into consideration when determining its effectiveness.
3.
Having
limited knowledge about the competitive environment and business dynamics of various geographies where you have business
partners.
Proper and sound knowledge
is must about the geographies of the business partners to be able to survive
the adverse position. A company needs multiple strategies for differing product
lines or businesses. A good way to test if a hedging strategy is good enough is
to pass it to a “stress test” it with
different “What if?” scenarios, which should include some modeling on how you
and your competition, suppliers, and/or partners would react. If you can’t live
with the results of a significant currency shock in either direction, chances
are your hedging strategy needs some adjusting.
4.
Having
an dislike to locking in losses
This problem often occurs with balance
sheet hedging. If the currency moves out of your favor compared to the accounting rate, the adjustment hedge
will lock in a loss. One cannot wait and rest on hopes , it needs to hedge to
always be in perfect situation.
5.
Creating
unnecessary volatility from liquidity management
Forecasting and hedging the balance
sheet in an optimal manner can help avoid unnecessary volatility from spot or forward
trading during the month, when managing a company’s liquidity needs. Whether
this activity occurs on a company’s “netting day” or any other time during the
month, using even swaps to manage liquidity needs avoids unnecessary spot rate
versus accounting rate impact, and eliminates the need to guess on collections
or payables timing.
No comments:
Post a Comment